Stoel Rives is excited to announce the 2024 update of The Construction Lien in Washington: A Legal Analysis for the Construction Industry, first published in 2015. This comprehensive guide covers recent case law, statutory changes, and critical lien procedures. It serves as an essential resource for contractors, developers, attorneys, and other industry professionals navigating
The Importance of Staying Organized for Discovery
Heidi VanderWel and Karl Oles discuss the importance of staying organized for discovery in their latest article for the Daily Journal of Commerce. Being well-prepared is crucial for companies facing potential litigation, especially during the discovery process. Organized records can save time and money when responding to interrogatories, requests for production, and depositions. Clear
Basic Information About the Court System
Here are some useful basics if you have a dispute that may be headed to court for resolution.
- Which court? Most civil disputes are heard in the state trial court in the county where the dispute arose. This court has different names in different states, including “superior court,” “circuit court,” and “district court.”
- When does
Washington Supreme Court Weighs in on Notice Requirements for Labor Liens: Velazquez Framing LLC v. Cascadia Homes, Inc.
Washington’s construction lien statute, RCW 60.04, balances the interests of persons performing work to improve real property with the interests of property owners in avoiding the necessity of paying for the same work twice. An unpaid contractor can assert a lien against property it has improved, but the owner has a right to notice that the work is taking place. On commercial projects, a contractor that is not under contract with the owner or prime contractor (a “lower-tier” subcontractor) usually must give a pre-claim notice to the owner to preserve its lien right. A contractor supplying only labor is expressly exempt from this requirement, though there has been some question regarding whether a lower-tier subcontractor providing both labor and materials is subject to the notice requirement.
Trying Large Construction Disputes CLE—Seattle
On October 6, 2023, I will be on the panel “Trying Large Construction Disputes,” to be presented during The Seminar Group’s 30th Annual Washington Construction Law conference on October 5 and 6, 2023, in Seattle or online. Intended for anyone who practices construction law, desires to practice construction law, or is confronted with matters involving
A New Year’s Resolution: More Consideration of Time Limits
In a world of pure cooperation, if the owner of a construction project or a contractor causes a problem, the responsible party would admit fault and make amends—rendering the negotiation of a construction contract unnecessary. In our less than ideal world, owners and contractors have adverse interests, the party at fault is not always clear
Washington Supreme Court Ruling Could Bring Changes to the Construction Industry
Originally published by the Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce on November 3, 2022.
In a 5-4 decision, the Washington Supreme Court recently ruled in Tadych v. Noble Ridge Construction, Inc. that a contract provision providing a one-year limitation period for filing a construction defect lawsuit was “unconscionable” and therefore unenforceable.
The court’s ruling revives a
Every Construction Project Comes With Risk, but It Can Be Managed
In my latest article for the Daily Journal of Commerce, I provide a few suggestions for contractors, and perhaps project owners as well, to manage risk through a construction contract. Provisions that can be included in a contract to achieve that end might include:
- The owner limits its potential claims to direct damages and
Benefits and Risks of Involving a Project’s Contractor in The Design
The roles of designers and contractors are being combined for more and more construction projects, an approach that comes with both benefits and risks. Several methods of project delivery are commonly in use, none of which is entirely exclusive — different projects may include different and overlapping roles for owner, designer and contractor. In my
Differing Site Conditions An Issue in the Seattle SR 99 Tunnel Litigation
In late 2019, the Washington State Department of Transportation and Seattle Tunnel Partners (STP) engaged in a nine-week trial of claims arising from construction of the new State Route 99 tunnel under downtown Seattle. One major issue for the jury was whether STP had encountered “differing site conditions” – unknown underground conditions that differ materially