Stoel Rives has been named to Construction Executive‘s The Top 50 Construction Law Firms™ annual national rankings for a seventh consecutive year and ranked No. 21 for 2026, rising six places from the 2025 ranking. Construction Executive evaluated firms on criteria that included construction practice revenue, number of attorneys in the practice, percentage of
2026 Best Practices for Construction Project Insurance
Insurance is meant to serve as a safety net for any construction project. But too often, that net has holes—some visible, many not. From ambiguous endorsements to missing documentation, small oversights can lead to major coverage gaps when a claim hits.
After decades of reviewing policies, litigating claims, and helping clients manage project risk, one
Third-Party Beneficiary Clauses: A Hidden Risk in Construction Contracts
Construction contracts are rarely “standard”—and even routine-looking terms can carry major consequences when something goes wrong. After two decades of resolving construction disputes, one pattern is clear: overlooked clauses at the signing table often resurface as major problems in litigation.
Among the most frequently misunderstood is the third-party beneficiary (TPB) clause. This seemingly minor provision
Mitigate Risk with a Construction Project Insurance Checkup
As 2024 approaches, developers, builders, and designers are urged to reassess their insurance strategies, as coverage mistakes can lead to severe denials during claims. Key pitfalls include relying on standard insurance forms, informal broker assurances, and neglecting to scrutinize policy endorsements. Best practices for effective risk management involve securing proof of insurance via actual policy
New Federal Rule Banning Noncompetes May Impact Construction Industry
In late April, the Federal Trade Commission issued a final rule, effective on September 4, 2024, that banned nationwide noncompete clauses—generally a binding contract that prevents a worker from competing with an employer after they leave its employ. In my latest column for the Daily Journal of Commerce, I look at some of the
Beware of ‘Standard’ Construction Contract Terms; Nothing Is ‘Standard’
In their focus on starting a construction project, developers, designers, and contractors can fall prey to unintended consequences arising from their deferral to and use of an “industry standard” contract form—as opposed to taking the time to precisely tailor the contract to the project’s needs and risks. In my latest article for the Daily Journal
Can a Contractor Simply Walk Off a Job?
Originally published as an Op-Ed by the Oregon Daily Journal of Commerce on October 20, 2022.
“It depends”—two words clients hate to hear from their lawyers. “It depends” is (regretfully) also the answer to the question posed in the headline: “Can a contractor simply walk off a job?”
While this topic is often covered by
The Importance of Third-party Beneficiary Clauses in Contracts
For anyone building a dream vacation home, renovating an existing commercial structure, or developing a multimillion-dollar, mixed-use project, construction contract terms are of utmost importance. One often overlooked clause covers the contractual “third-party beneficiary” (TBP)—a person or entity who, though not a party to the contract, stands to benefit from the contract’s performance. Interpretations of
Surety Bonds vs. Subcontractor Default Insurance
If a contractor cannot meet deadlines on a construction project or a subcontractor pulls out of a new project bid in order to pursue a more attractive opportunity, the project owner and/or prime contractor face potentially significant damages, which can include corrective work, costs of completion or substitute performance, and delay. In my latest column
Ensuring Your Construction Project Remains Insured
In too many cases, the developers, builders and designers of a construction project focus on starting work and pay inadequate attention to making sure important details of their insurance coverage are fully in place. Coverage denials can result from deferring to “standard” insurance forms, relying on informal broker assurances and not taking the time to