Originally published to the Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce on August 11, 2026

Ending a construction contract can trigger significant legal and practical consequences for owners and contractors. This article examines the risks that can arise when project participants decide to terminate or separate, including the differences between mutual separation, termination for cause, and termination

As construction projects increasingly rely on specialized or international suppliers, project teams should evaluate more factors than pricing and product availability. Overseas vendors can offer significant advantages, but they may also introduce legal and practical challenges that become difficult to manage if problems arise.

When disputes involve foreign suppliers, resolving issues like delayed deliveries, defective

Data center construction projects involve more than delivering complex technical infrastructure on an accelerated schedule. Owners, developers, contractors, and design professionals must navigate legal and contractual issues that can affect project performance, increase costs, and lead to disputes throughout the project lifecycle.

From performance-based specifications and schedule delays to equipment procurement challenges and commissioning requirements

Getting construction underway before a contract is signed can feel like a practical necessity in fast-paced projects. But what seems like progress can create unintended legal and operational risks. Modern construction agreements are detailed documents that define scope, risk allocation, insurance, compensation, and dispute resolution. When work begins without those terms firmly in place, parties

Limitation of liability (LOL) clauses are a standard fixture in contracts involving architects, engineers, and other design professionals—particularly because these parties often have limited assets and depend on such provisions to manage risk. However, Washington legal authority suggests these clauses may not offer the ironclad protection many expect.

While LOL clauses can shield design professionals

Key Considerations in Subcontract Negotiations

Negotiating subcontracts presents challenges for both general contractors and subcontractors. General contractors must balance responsibilities to owners and subcontractors while managing risk. Subcontractors, often with limited negotiation power, should focus on key risk-shifting provisions.

Prime Contract Role
Subcontracts often include “flow down” clauses, requiring subcontractors to assume general contractor obligations.

As the multifamily market rebounds (hopefully) in 2025, potential new tariffs on materials like steel, lumber, and appliances are raising concerns for developers and contractors alike. Many clients question how to address price escalation risks arising from tariffs in their standard fixed price (FP) and guaranteed maximum price (GMP) contracts, including under changes-in-law clauses, allowances

Construction project owners, contractors, and design professionals sometimes fall into the trap of not giving careful consideration to the risks specific to a given project and will wait until an actual dispute arises before closely analyzing the dispute resolution provisions in a design or construction agreement. In my latest article in the Daily Journal of

Bringing a construction project to fruition involves significant risks to project owners, designers, and contractors. Many of those risks will be allocated in the parties’ contracts, in turn requiring those parties to obtain insurance and further allocating risks to insurance companies. Several commonly used insurance policies are at the heart of any construction project insurance

Parties negotiating a design and construction contract for a large project will often leave for the end discussions of a few provisions that one side or the other has characterized as “deal-breakers.” Though the deal may be doomed to fail, one of the parties may also make a concession or concessions, have its bluff called