In a ruling supporting common sense, the Idaho Supreme Court ruled that a county could not avoid the application of a broad force majeure clause in its development agreement with a developer based on the county’s denial of the rezoning required for the very development.
The key facts in Burns Concrete, Inc. v. Teton County
When engaging in a new construction project, the primary focus is frequently on the immediate issues — plans, permits and the build-out itself. But building good risk management procedures and techniques into the front end of your project planning can have bottom-line business benefits. In my recent article for the Daily Journal of Commerce, written
During the last month or two there has been a rise of news reports regarding potential earthquakes in California at a greater magnitude than in recent history: see here and here. These risks have even been reported recently in a London newspaper. While the unusual Southern California “big one” warning is now past
Many times I hear from people who want to “save money” and serve as their own “owner-builder” under the exemption to the California Contractor’s Licensing law, which generally requires that any “construction” work over $500 to be performed by a licensed California contractor in the absence of an exemption. (Bus. & Prof. Code section
A common insurance question asked by our owner/developer clients when they discover that their completed project has defects is whether their own insurance will cover the cost to fix the defect or any damage from the defect. While trying hard not to sound like the proverbial lawyer, we often have to say “it depends.” What
It seems that almost weekly, and certainly monthly, I receive a call or inquiry from colleagues and/or prospective clients as to whether a license is really required if the prospective “contractor” is not actually building anything but is merely facilitating a “deal” or is hiring otherwise qualified and licensed contractors and trades. Virtually every time
In my recent article, “If You Build It, They Will Come,” I discuss the five keys of project risk management that contractors must take into consideration in the wake of the Great Recession.
Read the full article here.
“If You Build It, They Will Come,” was originally published on January 16, 2015 by the
The Idaho Supreme Court recently determined in Idaho Power Company v. New Energy Two, LLC, No. 40882-2013 (Idaho June 17, 2014), that the Idaho Public Utilities Commission has jurisdiction to interpret or enforce contracts when given the authority by the parties. In May 2010, IPC and the defendants entered into two energy contracts that were to be completed by a date certain. In advance of the operational dates, the defendants notified IPC of events they claimed were force majeure. Markedly, the defendants’ claim was that the decision-making process of the PUC itself, or the alleged lack thereof, was the force majeure event causing lenders to be “unwilling to lend in Idaho pending the outcome” of the PUC proceedings. IPC filed petitions with the PUC seeking a ruling that there was no force majeure event(s), and that IPC could terminate the contracts. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss that was denied, and the Idaho Supreme Court heard the issue on a permissive appeal.
California has held for at least a decade that in order for there to be insurance coverage under a standard Comprehensive General Liability for a claim arising out of a construction project, including a duty to defend by the insurer, there must be damage to other property, not solely to the property on which the insured worked. (See F&H Construction v. ITT Hartford Ins. Co. (2004) 118 Cal.App.4th 364.) The recent decision of Regional Steel Corporation v. Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation (May 16, 2014, No. BC464209) __ Cal.App.2d. __ [2014 WL 2643242] (Regional Steel), in the California Court of Appeal highlights a not uncommon problem in construction actions, and several ramifications for owner/general contractors (GCs) to consider at project inception to alleviate and mitigate these issues are outlined below.
I am surprised, and yet not surprised, to read about yet another subcontractor and general contractor that were cited for the subcontractor’s lack of a California contractor’s license. See "Another Subcontractor on Large Southern California Project Told To Halt Work, Fined for Not Having Contractors License" (May 13, 2014 notification by CSLB —